The dark occult “ruling class”
cannot just outright tell people,
“Hey, we’re Satanists,
and we’re gonna give you
our ideologies and mindset.
And then you’re
gonna help us enslave yourselves.”

No one would accept or cooperate with that.

So, they have to create a dialectic.

Their main method is through different “Appeals To Authority,” because they want to set themselves up as the gods of society.

Thus, we have the political wings.

They know people are basically split into two camps.

There are people with motherly abandonment issues which is the Left-Wing, who want authority in the form of provider and nurturer.

They’re appealing to their sense of misplaced compassion, to this right-brain imbalanced notion that “we have to care for everyone,” to secure the “common good” needs regardless of the means, regardless of Individual Rights.

This camp wants government and authority to be Mommy that’s going to nurture and care for everyone, and provide all the resources like mother’s milk.

The individual doesn’t matter, and the “common good” has to supersede everything.

This imbalance is exploited and preyed upon by the Satanists.

The method of the Right Wing sect is also Appeal To Authority, but through selfishness and security of individual desires.

The social engineers realize there are other people in society that are more selfish and care more about themselves than providing for the “common good,” so they prey on that dynamic.

These are people who focus too much on selfish concerns at the expense of the TRUE common good, and there is such a thing.

It’s the Law of Freedom. Aggregate freedom comes about through aggregate morality.

That’s the common good – doing good in the common sense term of understanding Conscience; by understanding the actual objective difference between Right and Wrong behavior.

The Right Wing also has parental abandonment issues.

They want government to be Daddy, the protector, with a strong military force.

In other words, a standing army which our own Founding Fathers repeatedly warned against.

“Once a standing army is established in any country, the people lose their liberty.

Recollect the history
of most nations of the world

What havoc, desolation, and destruction, have been perpetrated by standing armies!” — George Mason

The Left Wing creates false notions of “equality,” because they think Rights come from government or from social agreements.

They believe Rights can be granted or taken away, and that some can have more Rights than others.

The Right Wing also has false notions of Rights, often referring to the Constitution as the source.

Both have the “ME ME ME” mindset in one form or another.

Neither has any true understanding of Rights, Sovereignty, or Freedom.

We are ALL equal in our Rights under Natural Law because we are born with those Rights.

They are the gift of Creation. But the Right-Wing sect is always more self-absorbed and self-oriented (“MY rights, MY comforts, MY freedom, screw the rest of you”) while the Left-Wing are only concerned with the whole.

There’s no balance there… for either.

For individual rights AND the good of society. That’s the equilibrium point.

You have to focus on what’s morally good and right for the individual AND for society as a whole.

That’s a very difficult balance to strike because most people are imbalanced towards one brain hemisphere or the other.

The dark occultists know this because they know more about the brain – the physiology and psychology – than almost all of the people of the world put together.

All of them constitute a “mastermind” of evil, and the universe is going to grant their manifestations because they’re all on the same page while we’re all divided in the dialectic that they’ve set up for us.

Sadly, people still can’t see it, and still won’t abandon it because they’re too attached to it, EGOICALLY… and can’t admit they’ve been duped.

It’s pure evil brilliance.

It’s a genius-level methodology
and strategy of dividing and conquering.

And that’s why the average dupe – eating poison, drinking poison, watching poison – cannot cognize or conceive the level of these people’s genius and methodologies at work in the world.

Many people think
they will vote the world
into changing

As if no one needs to think for themselves and be responsible for their own lives; we just need to keep abdicating our personal responsibility and choose to have someone else represent us in life.

We just give up our power and decision making ability for our own behaviors to live in harmony, alignment and unison with Natural Law, and instead have someone else decide for us what we can and can’t do.

To control us, because we don’t want to control ourselves, because we don’t want to be masters of ourselves, because we don’t want to become true sovereigns united within ourselves and united with what is right, good and true.

If you understand everything about this whole operation, and can cognize it fully, you know what you need to do next, right?

QUIT YOUR CULT

Quit your cult and help others, teach others.

Regardless of which political sect you’ve bought into, they both lead to one ultimate goal: HUMAN SLAVERY.

That’s all government has ever been, what it is now, and what it will always be.

They don’t care which one you choose, as long as you choose.

Most people believe that they are free because the media and politicians tell them that they are, however in truth we are merely slaves caught up in an illusion we think as being freedom.

Freedom is very simple; it is the ability to be an individual free from all law. In order to have law, which is in of itself an artificially created reason to control someone other than you, force is used to gain compliance, hence force of law.

However this is done without gaining permission from the creator of us, the earth and of all of creation, there argument falls apart as their authority is based only upon hearsay.

They work their authority through fraud being that everyone and everything is considered to be some form of property all owned by the Ruling Bloodline families.

At birth your parents give you a name unknowingly transferring the ownership of that name to the state.

We could not be owned if we did not accept names as it is through the names that ownership of our bodies by the few exists, yet we are not the names and there in is the fraud.

The ruling bloodline families have and are using force against us on a daily basis to gain our compliance to follow a set of laws which we have no say in nor control over all of which is designed to enrich the bloodline ruling elite families as all law is based in commerce thus for each law broken millions of dollars are created in various types of bonds and fines, which only benefit the system and the Bloodline Ruling Elite.

Thus there are two sets of laws, one for the poor who are the slaves and virtually no laws for the ruling elite families and their enforcers; which are the Police and System slaves in general.

In truth we live on the earth and not in Countries.

They have divided up the earth into Countries through use of force projected through imperialism and war. All of which has been done without any proof authority to do so from our creator.

The Bible talks about God and LORD God. Genesis 1 you will read all about God and his creation of the earth and all that exists.

Then in Genesis 2 forward it is all about LORD God and his enslavement of man and claiming to be the creator of all that exists.

However God the creator did not create religion or ask us to worship him in anyway.

God went so far as to give man dominion over all the earth, meaning we all rule equally as stated in Genesis 1:26.

That said we can clearly observe that God’s will has been thwarted by those who pretend to uphold it, mainly being the Popes of the Catholic Church and all leaders of Religion in general, including Islam, Hinduism etc.

This is simply because in the Bible in God’s own words he gave all man dominion and the various religious institutions are there to create enforceable laws that are designed to enslave and restrict free thought and expression and mostly enslave people.

The Foundation of freedom is that we are all suppose to be free to think and do what we wish to without anyone using any force against us to make us comply in fear for our safety.

The Justice System is a complete farce in that it pretends to represent the will of the people by creating laws which enslave them.

In many cases there is so much greed and corruption that goes on, that the only thought that goes into creating laws, is this law going to be good for the ruling elite or not.

They are all there to serve the ruling elite and so as long the laws don’t apply to the enforcers or the ones creating them, the ruling elite simply create a system of laws that benefit them, especially laws concerning the creation of money and usury through loans.

The foundation of mammon or money is based in fraud. For whatever they use for money, be it Gold, Silver, Fiat Currencies, the value of the species of mammon does not reflect the labour put in to create it. For example you can hit a ore deposit where you simply chip away at the deposit for 10 minutes and get 24 ounces of Gold, worth about $42,000.00 for 10 minutes of work versus spending labouring at some dead end job for a whole month and getting $1200.00 in pay.

Thus those who control the amount of mammon allowed to circulate and own the sources of the mammon get to have everything that they want, while everyone else slaves to get a small amount of mammon in comparison to pay for the basics.

It allows for inequality to artificially exists allowing the few to have a lot more than the many in terms of products and services and ultimately power over the system to control others.

The other aspect to this is that fiat currency the money is merely paper with some ink and some fancy security protection built in as to not allowing others to copy it easily in creating counterfeit notes.

The problem again comes into play with the labour required to make the notes compared to the labour to earn a note.

The Federal reserve and other scams like it run through central banks, print the money at a labour cost of pennies per sheet of bills of any denomination and give it to the people as private money for the face value enriching themselves from pennies to produce lets say a $100 bill then selling into the market at face value making a huge profit on it, then charge interest on it and collect that interest through personal income tax, which has nothing to do with running the services needed in a country.

The services are paid through issuing cheques and using the signature of the one cashing the cheque to create the funds for the cheque, thus the funds created by the signature was simply a data entry into the computer.

So in order to stem inflation, the personal income tax and other taxes are implemented and economies are set up so that there are many low paying jobs and only a few high paying jobs.

Thus the system of control is enforced through artificially created scarcities.

The other thing they do with fiat currencies is valuate different currencies at different values so that they can create artificial scarcity in one country and plenty in others; such as you see with African Countries versus European and North American Countries.

Where we see starving African Children and a simple donation of $30/month and will save one child from starvation, we see $30.00 as for paying for one meal at a restaurant.

Yet there is no defensible argument that can be put forward that one hours labour by someone is worth something different by someone else.

The idea that we have higher education and can do more difficult work does not detract from the fact that education should be free to begin with and simply because you learn to do something that others can’t doesn’t mean that your labour is worth more, it just means that you have improved yourself to help serve others better to make a better world or place for your fellow man.

This brings us to the notion of service to self versus service to others.

Service to self to enrich oneself over the detriment of others creates in the end a very unbalanced and dangerous situation, where many laws and people are needed as enforcers to hold the masses back from you, allowing you to enjoy the fruits of the labour of others with little or no labour from yourself and thus dictate to the masses how they should live and be.

Versus service to others where we are all individuals wanting to be the best we can be in service to our fellow man and willing to make do with a little less so everyone is cared for in terms of the necessities of life and meaningful purpose to do what they want to help build a future based on equality and love for all life on earth.

On a side note those who believe that professional sports are fairly run, you have got to get your head out of the sand and look around.

It is so obvious how one team is heavily penalized for the most minor infraction while another gets away with murder so to speak.

Star players are given room from other players so they can have the time and opportunities to line up good shots on the goal, such as it is in hockey and basketball.

Sports has always been used as a distraction for the masses getting them more involved in what team wins or loses as being more important as to how you are being enslaved.

The people behind all this are Satanists. They are at war with God and thus have no will to follow what God said in his own words that we all share in dominion over the earth.

Outside of the religious connotations who is the creator of the earth and if you don’t know, then where do you get to assume that you can use force of law against others to create wide spread poverty and despair so you can have a sheltered and wealthy lifestyle?

They do not care about us as they only care about themselves and what is in it for them.

Further the level of pedophilia and Satanic Human Sacrifice runs rapid as they live to serve a top down structure of control.

There are also evil spirits that they worship that feed off the fear created by them through their system of control.

Many people are not aware of the satanic rituals that take place in there churches today, one being cannibalism of Christ’s body through the bread and wine thing in Catholic Churches.

Simply put from cradle to grave you are feed a bunch a shit, told you are worthless and a sinner and then spat out once you can not produce as a good slave anymore.

Each day I cringe in disbelief at the level of lies people by into. The big one being that if you work hard like the rest of us you too can have a big house and fancy cars. Well minimum wage doesn’t do that for you.

Those that do get good paying jobs have to usually pay off a mortgage in student loans and pay heavy taxes on the larger sums of money they earn to give to the ruling elite for having a few hired slaves to print money for them sell you and through their phoney front Corporations called Governments at face value and then charge you interest as it is merely considered debt money.

There is no way to pay back the debt so again when it all crashes they just wash away the debt and start over, except this time they aim to kill off the 80% or more of the worlds population by devaluing the currencies and creating artificial scarcity through lack of money.

In the USA they are looking to pass a law making it illegal for people to grow there own food and sell food outside of the controlled system.

Thus bringing in the enforces again to create widespread starvation once the currency is devalued.

The $26 Trillion dollar theft that Congress allowed to take place to bail out the bankers was not used to prop up the defaults on the homes, but rather was used to give the bloodline families and their enforces the money they needed to survive a devaluation of the world currencies.

They also own most of the God as well. So where does that put us?

It puts us the 93% who have to endure all this into a position of wondering why are we allowing a few to control the many in this way?

We can and should have changed all this many years ago to doing things out of service to others rather, meaning we do what we love to do and do it for the love of our fellow man.

The few that are among us that are perpetuating this system of insanity through their enforcers care only about themselves and what is in it for them.

Slaves must not be allowed to have weapons and is the reason that they are desperately trying to disarm us before the hammer comes down.

Why we are being made to suffer and potentially being wiped out by the few is merely so that the few can have Pedophile and Satanic heaven on earth, controlling their slaves with micro chips and “non-lethal” weapons.

They want to torture us and want to bring about a level of suffering like no one could ever believe possible and yet enjoy all the fruits of our discoveries and technological advancements.

We do have some help in that the truth vibrations are getting stronger and stronger by the day now.

Within the next 10 years I suspect much of this will be over with as the earth aligns with our Galactic Center and we start doing what we do out of love for one another instead of self gain for the few.

How we get there I am not sure,
but I can tell you each day
I move forward in this,
I hate the system a little bit more
and yearn to be free of it.

I think the introduction of free energy technology and a move to make everyone self-sufficient in terms of food, shelter and clothing will go a long way in helping us break free.

But you can see them moving to bring in laws along with their enforcers to stop that from happening.

So I suspect at some point a line will be drawn and a few will be killed by the many to bring about change.

I hope they can see that they are in a lost cause, but they think their enforcers along with their laws will keep people buying into the system long enough for the few to kill off the many.

So when will you draw your line and when will you begin to try to do your part in helping with the transition from slavery to freedom?

Freedom, like truth, is not inherited. It must be learned and preserved by each generation.

The pursuit of truth, freedom and happiness is every man’s birthright and individual responsibility.

It cannot be transferred or deferred to another or to a government. People who don’t accept individual responsibility, and won’t strive for their own freedom, are known as slaves.

Freedom for man is expressed perfectly in God’s law as it sets guidelines to protect one’s own freedom without violating the freedom of others.

God, by teaching us His law (truth), gave us the means for freedom.

Jesus reiterated it.

Truth leads us towards freedom and away from slavery.

Freedom begins with a concept — a state of mind.

The mind, once freed, then goes on to pursue physical freedom as well. In John 8:32, Jesus states: “And you shall know the truth, and the truth shall set you free.”

Freedom comes from truth, and cannot come from central government — itself being a fraud, and its methods primarily lies, tricks, and deceit.

You were born a living soul with flesh and blood, with the responsibility to respect other life and treat your fellow man with love and kindness, and with a life-spirit provided by the Creator.

Your unalienable rights are for life, liberty and property, and to respect those rights of other human beings on this planet, our home.

In an attempt to create a safe society, men elected Governments to protect and uphold your unalienable rights and your responsibilities to the Creator and your fellow man.

After a while, Governments became corrupt and now we have to ask:

How could Governments and other “regulatory bodies” possibly make you follow their rules and be subservient to them since your true allegiance is to your Creator?

How can you serve two masters – your creator and your Government?

The answer is that you cannot serve two masters, therefore the Government had to create a system that tricks you into thinking you must serve them, where in fact, Governments must serve us, the people.

“Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law,” (Preamble – Universal Declaration of Human Rights)

One of the ways Governments and other regulators have tricked you into thinking you must follow their rules, is to create for themselves an “artificial-person / corporation” who is not you, but whom the Government has fooled you into thinking is you.

But, so as not to violate your fundamental rights, they also have provided recognition in law for another legal entity called a “natural-person” (simply meaning a human-being in the law) with which most of your fundamental rights are still intact.

So when you interact with the law, you may be represented as an artificial or natural person – you choose.

This concept of an “artificial-person”, a legally obligated entity, that appears to be you, but in fact is not you, is a little difficult to grasp at first.

Once the Government creates an “artificial-person” that simulates you (i.e. appears to be the same as you from your point of view), but is actually a contrivance of government laws and regulations — then they’ve got you, so to speak.

And if you fill out paperwork and sign documents as if you were this artificial-person then they can make you totally subservient to all their rules and regulations: Make you believe you are obligated to pay taxes, Make you believe that you have to obtain a driver’s licence, Make you believe that you have to work as an Employee.

Natural vs. Artificial:

There are two “persons” identified in law. These are “natural-person” and “artificial-person”.

A natural-person is defined as “A human being that has the capacity for rights and duties”.
Note that the word capacity means the ability, but not the obligation for rights and duties.

An artificial-person is defined as “A legal entity, not a human being, recognized as a person in law to whom legal rights and duties may attach – e.g. a body corporate”. Sometimes an artificial-person may be referred to as a CORPORATION, which is not always the same as an Incorporated Company.

These subtle re-definitions are made in Statutes whenever the Government wants to change the meaning of the word.

There are many different types of artificial-persons, each with different duties. Here are a few different types of artificial-persons:Taxpayer, Resident, Driver, Voter, Citizen, Homeowner, Officer.

Whenever you read any Law or Statute, you must be sure to check the meaning of the word “person” as it applies to that particular law.

In order to implement slavery of it’s citizens and control them according to its whim, the Government had to invent a system that would not violate a human-being’s fundamental rights, but would allow the Government to “own” everything produced or gained by its citizens.

The technique used by the Government was to create an artificial-person (referred to herein as a CORPORATION for emphasis) for every human-being in Canada.

As creator of a CORPORATION, the Government can demand anything it wants from the CORPORATION.

As a legal entity, a CORPORATION does not have feelings and cannot be hurt.

It can be subject to slavery and complete domination by its creator and the CORPORATION must obey its creator.

So for every John Doe human-being in Canada, the Government created a JOHN DOE CORPORATION.

Capital letters are used to represent CORPORATIONS and COMPANIES.

Lower case letters are used to represent the name of the natural-person.

As a CORPORATION needs a business number, in order to do business, the Government assigns a unique business number to each JOHN DOE it creates.

Such a business number is called the S.I.N. (Slave Identification Number a.k.a. Social Insurance Number).

The creator (Master) can then track all activities of the Slave and claim ownership on all property and income of the Slave.

Finally the Government needs to appoint an Officer of the CORPORATION to run the day-to-day activities.

Such a position requires a contract since the Officer will be held accountable for the actions of the CORPORATION.

So, the Government tricks John Doe to become the Officer for the JOHN DOE CORPORATION by signing such contracts as Driver’s Licence, Bank Accounts, Citizenship Cards, Passports, etc.

In the Income Tax Act, the Government just decrees that John Doe is the Legal Representative for the Officer of the JOHN DOE CORPORATION and the only contract involved is the annual Income Tax Return (yes it is a contract for one year) wherein John Doe gives his agreement as Officer of JOHN DOE for the previous year.

Unfortunately John Doe does not know that he is an Officer for the JOHN DOE CORPORATION and must therefore follow the rules imposed upon JOHN DOE.

Hence the confusion sets in because John Doe believes that he is JOHN DOE and therefore has to forfeit his rights and duties upon demand by the Government and its officials.

Here is a quotation from “Memorandum on Law of the Name”, which summarizes the so-called Name Game used by the courts (the All-Caps NAME is a legal-fiction: something presumed by law to be true until said presumption is rebutted and the truth is brought forward):‘It is clear that the existance of a NAME written as all-caps is a necessity-created legal-fiction.

This is surely an issue to be raised, and the supporting particulares are outlined in this memorandum. Use of the proper name must be insisted upon as a matter of abatement – correction – for all parties of an action of purported law.

However, the current “courts” cannot correct this since they are all based upon presumed/assumed fictional law and must use artificial, juristic NAMES.

Instead, they expect the lawful Christian man or woman to accept the all-caps NAME and agree by silence to be treated as if he or she were a fictional entity invented and governed by mortal enemies.

They must go to unlimited lengths to deceive and coerce this compliance or the underlying criminal farce would be exposed and a world-wide plunder/enslavement racket that has held all life on this planet in a vice grip for millenia would crumble and liberate every living thing.

At this point, the would-be rulers of the world would be required to succeed in life by honest, productive labours, the way those upon whom they parasitically feed are forced to conduct their lives.’

Government Tricks:

First Trick:The first ‘trick’ of the Government is the re-definition of certain critical words in each Statute (Act).

They (the Government) want you to presume the ordinary meaning of the word so as to trick you into reading and interpreting the Statute in their favour.

Two key words that are re-defined in almost every Statute are the words “person” and “individual”.

There are only two “persons” in law, a human being, and everything else: A natural-person is a legal entity for the human-being.

An artificial-person is a legal entity that is not a human being.

Comment from DetaxCanada: Both types of “person” are legal fictions.

A natural person is a human in the false or fictional status of slave crewmember on a make-believe ship called a “body politic”.

An “artificial person” is a make-believe ship called a body corporate or politic.

The definition found in dictionaries states that a natural person is a human being. In legal terms, a human being refers to a human body without considering the mind – it being the captain of the vessel called the human body.

A vessel at sea (equivalent to an ‘adult human’) is impervious to outside command , as the captain is the supreme commander.

A human who is of “natural person status”, is as a captain of a vessel in ‘dry dock’ – he and his vessel being subservient to the vessel owner, the Crown..

The natural status of an (adult) human is “free will”, and thus sovereign over his own human body.

Outside control is equivalent to some form of “piracy” – call it what you may.

Here are the exact definitions from Barron’s Canadian Law Dictionary, fourth edition (ISBN 0-7641-0616-3): natural person.

A natural person is a human being that has the capacity for rights and duties. artificial person.

A legal entity, not a human being, recognized as a person in law to whom certain legal rights and duties may attached – e.g. a body corporate.

You will observe that the natural-person has the “capacity” (i.e. ability) for rights and duties, but not necessarily the obligation. The artificial-person has rights and duties that may be attached (i.e. assigned) by laws.

Comment from DetaxCanada: “Capacity for” is not the same as “Having” rights and duties.

The only ‘duties’ a free-will human has are those found in the negative and positive form of the Golden Rule – Do (or, do not) unto others as you would have (not have) others do unto you.

Thus, for the free-will human, rights and duties come from the Creator Father, not from government.

The “created” cannot dictate to the “creator” – and as the Declaration of Independence says: “That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, …”

Alternative expressions for a “natural-person” are “real-person”, “human-person”, or “human-being”.

Since governments have recently become paranoid about the use of the term “natural-person” perhaps it is better to use the terms “human-person” or “human-being” instead.

Other terms like “private-person” could be misleading because a “private legal entity” (such as a private corporation versus a public corporation) may be called a private-person, which should not be mistaken with a natural-person, human-person, or human-being.

The trick is to get you to believe that “private” means “human”, which is not necessarily true.

Second Trick:

The second ‘trick’ of the Government is to use the Interpretation Act to define words that apply to all Statutes, unless re-defined within a particular Statute.

Without this knowledge, you could presume the ordinary meaning for the words you are reading, not realizing that they may have been defined by the Interpretation Act.

Unless these words have been re-defined in another Statute, the underlying definitions for the two most important words still apply, either from the Interpretation Act, or the Canadian Law Dictionary. Basically, they are defined as follows:

From the Canadian Law Dictionary we find that:
individual means a natural person,
from the Income Tax Act we find the re-definition:
individual means an artificial person.

from the Canadian Law Dictionary we find that:
person means an individual (natural person) or incorporated group (artificial person),
from the Interpretation Act we find the re-definition:
person means a corporation (an artificial- person),
from the Income Tax Act we find the re-definition again:
person means an artificial person (amongst other things).

Third Trick:

The third ‘trick’ of the Government is to use both the word “means” and the word “includes” in the definition (interpretation) section of the act.

They do this in some critical definitions that they want you to misinterpret.

It is important to understand the difference between “means” and “includes” when used in definitions.

Previously we believed that “means” and “includes” were interchangeable, however after much study of many statutes, we now have a revised belief, as contained herein.

Here is the interpretation of “means” within statutes:
Basic Form: subject means objects;

Effect:

means implies a substitution of words.
means creates a new definition for the subject.
the subject does not need to be pre-defined.
the objects need to be pre-defined.
any pre-existing definition of the subject is replaced by the objects.
Example from the Bank Act:

1
2
3
“person” means a natural person, an entity or a personal representative;Interpretation of the above Example from the Bank Act:

Any pre-existing definition for “person” is substituted with the given objects, so when person is stated in the Bank Act, any or all of the objects are used in place of the word person.
Here is the interpretation of “includes” within statutes:

Basic Form: subject includes players; Effect:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

1. includes implies a one-way attachment of the players to the subject.
2. includes does not create a new definition for the subject.
3. the subject needs to be pre-defined.
4. the players need to be pre-defined.
5. any pre-existing definition of subject is still effective.
6. any player can play the role of, or act as a replacement for, the subject.
7. a subject may not play the role of, or act as a replacement for, any player.
8. includes implies attachment for role-playing – the players may play the subject’s role in the Act but not vice versa.
Example from the Income Tax Act:

“employee” includes officer;
“corporation” includes an incorporated company;
“insurance policy” includes a life insurance policy;
“taxpayer” includes any person whether or not liable to pay tax;
“person”, or any word or expression descriptive of a person, includes any corporation, and any entity exempt, because of subsection 149(1), from tax under Part I on all or part of the entity’s taxable income and the heirs, executors, liquidators of a succession, administrators or other legal representatives of such a person, according to the law of that part of Canada to which the context extends;
Interpretation of the above Examples from the Income Tax Act:

An officer may play the role of an employee, but not vice versa. For example, any employee (pre-defined – may be a waitress) may not play the role of a Judicial Office (an officer). Within the Income Tax Act, both employee and officer are pre-defined by the use of the verb means.

An incorporated company may act as a corporation but not vice versa. For example, any corporation (pre-defined – may be unincorporated) may not act as an incorporated company.

A life insurance policy may play the role of an insurance policy but not vice versa. For example, any insurance policy (pre-defined – may be house insurance policy) may not play the role of a life insurance policy.

1
A person (including a natural person) may act in the capacity of a taxpayer but not vice versa. For example, any taxpayer (pre-defined – may be a corporation) may not act in the capacity of any person (especially a natural person).
A corporation (including an incorporated company) may act as a person, but not vice versa. For example, any person (e.g. an individual, or a natural person) may not act as a corporation.
Here is the interpretation of “means and includes” within statutes:

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Basic Form: subject means objects, and includes players;

Effect:
1. means creates a new definition for the subject from the objects.
2. the subject does not need to be pre-defined.
3. the objects need to be pre-defined.
4. the players need to be pre-defined.
5. any pre-existing definition of the subject is replaced by the objects.
6. and includes implies a one-way attachment of the players to the new subject.
7. any player can play the role of, or act as a replacement for, the new subject.
8. a new subject may not play the role of, or act as a replacement for, any player.
9. means and includes implies a new subject definition with an attachment for role-playing – the players may play the new subject’s role in the Act but not vice versa.
Example from the Interpretation Act:

1
“province” means a province of Canada, and includes the Yukon Territory, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut;
Interpretation of the above Example from the Interpretation Act:

Any pre-existing definition for “province” is substituted with “a province of Canada”, and any of the players (Yukon Territory, the Northwest Territories and Nunavut) may play the role of a province, but not vice versa.

For example, any province may not play the role of Nunavut.

The use of the word includes is key to understanding your potential loss of natural-person.

This is the major trick used by the Government in an attempt to take away your natural-person rights.

Unless you know this, you will voluntarily forfeit your rights.

Now that includes is no longer believed to be restrictive, you have to look elsewhere in the statutes to find out where your rights, as a natural person, are preserved.

Your rights will be upheld somewhere, you just have to find out where.

Fourth Trick:

The fourth ‘trick’ is directly attributable to a defect in the English language in respect of the verb ‘to be’.

In the English language there are many different meanings of the verb ‘to be’ and the reader/listener may misinterpret the intended (or ‘trick’) meaning and thereby draw the wrong conclusion from its use.

The two different and distinct meanings of the verb ‘to be’ which concern us are: the one meaning which relates to the essence of the subject (such as the table is made of wood; he is strong) and the other meaning which relates to a temporary location or position (such as the table is over there; he is a swimmer).

To be succinct, the two relevant meanings of interest, in this ‘trick’, may be summarized by the following simple definition:

to be, means ‘to have the essence of, to exist or live’ (in the sense of essence), or ‘to occupy a place or position’ (in the sense of location or position).

By the way, the noun ‘essence’ requires the helper verb ‘to have’.

Be careful with ‘exist’ because an artificial person can ‘exist’ on a piece of paper somewhere in a file, but an artificial person cannot exist as ‘living’.

Now to utilize the Fourth Trick associated with ‘to be’, a judge may make a ruling as follows:

1
“a natural person is a taxpayer”, or “a natural person is a driver”
which immediately translates into the valid conclusion, with regard to occupying a position (because someone has to do the paperwork), that:

“a natural person occupies the position of a taxpayer”

However, a judge cannot make a ruling that:

1
2
‘a natural person has the essence of a taxpayer’
‘a natural person lives as a taxpayer’
because human rights are immediately violated and slavery would be condoned by the judge.

The conclusion, in respect of the Fourth Trick, is to be careful when reading the word “is” and check for ‘essence’ or ‘location’. What you think you read may not be in fact what you really read.

You can very quickly get clarification by asking: “When you say is, do you mean occupies a position, or do you mean has the essence of (lives as)?” With this question you will immediately expose any ‘trick’ which is being utilized.

Spanish is one of the few languages which has maintained a distinction by having two separate verbs; the verb ‘ser’, derived from the Latin ‘esse’ (English ‘essence’), is used ‘to have essence’; and the verb ‘estar’, derived from the Latin ‘stare’ (English ‘state’), is used for a ‘temporary location or position’.

Fifth Trick:

The fifth ‘trick’ is the use of the word ‘you’ to create joinder between the one who speaks, and the artificial-person.

Achilles’ Heel, is “You” Who “you” are, is no longer the question.

The question is, who “IS” you.

The word “you” gets more people into trouble than any other word currently utilized within our legal and financial systems.

It is virtually impossible to fully explain the proper grammatical usage of the word “you”, insofar as proper English is concerned.

Wikipedia: You (stressed 0/ˈjuː/; unstressed /jə/) is the second-person personal pronoun in Modern English.

Ye was the original nominative form; the oblique/objective form is you(functioning originally as both accusative and dative), and the possessive is your or yours.

Your Dictionary.com:you (yo̵̅o̅) pronounpl.you1. the person to whom one is speaking or writing: personal pronoun in the second person (sing. & pl.): you is the nominative and objective form (sing. & pl.), yours the possessive (sing. & pl.), and yourself (sing.) and yourselves (pl.) the reflexive and intensive; your is the possessive pronominal adjective 2. any person: equivalent in sense to indefinite one: you can never be sure!

Note: Though you is properly a plural, it is in all ordinary discourse used also in addressing a single person, yet properly always with a plural verb. (No confusion here!) Loosely, the word “you” is a pronoun, that cannot be properly grammatically used according to English language rules.

When spoken, “you” is commonly heard by everyone present, as if it were being addressed to each of them, individually, in a singular sense.

We erroneously hear a singular inclination of the properly plural expression, as in one speaking to a group and saying; “I’m happy to share this with you.”

Properly, “you” is indeed “plural”, yet the word “you” is often spoken as if it were in reference to a singular man or woman. In such instances, the word “you” induces a natural inclination for everyone in an audience to hear it as being addressed singularly to a specific individual within that audience, particularly if the word “you” follows an antecedent noun; as in one speaking to that same group, and saying; “Yes George, I’m happy to share this with you.” In “law”, this word “you”, is properly utilized in all ordinary legal discourse when addressing the singular mind(or the single party with volition)within the plural-nature-construct of a PERSON.

The PERSON being comprised of a man that answers for, or is liable for that PERSON, and the corporate entity that IS that PERSON.

In this sense, addressing a PERSON, as “you”, is actually as close to a proper use of the word “you”, as anyone could imagine.

Sixth Trick:

The sixth ‘trick’ is the use of the Birth Certificate to create a bunch of legal entities with NAMEs derived from the Birth Certificate, and to get you to agree that you are the same as the NAME on the Birth Certificate.

Unravelling a little of the TRUTH that shall help to set you Free:
You are a natural being, born of natural parents. Your parents “gave” you a natural name, then they unwittingly “granted” by means of commercial exchange (a legal contract), a duplicate version of that same name to the province.

This duplicate “name” was also created by your parents, thus it was their private property, to do with as they desired. Subsequently, because they did not know of exactly what they had done, and because therefore they were unable to properly explain to you what they had done (because much of what they had done was induced upon them by trickery) ,you unwittingly pretended to be that duplicate name, or pretended that you could be identified by that duplicate name, every time you allowed yourself to be identified by it, and or every time you effectively operated as it, by acting or behaving as if you were it, or could be identified by it.

Your copy of the birth certificate is not a contract, it is merely a copy of are ceipt, evidencing the irrevocable gift (grant) of THEIR name made by your parents.

They created/made that duplicate name, thus they had the right to grant it to whoever, or whatever “state” they desired.

You do not qualify to hold an original receipt, because you were not a party to the original contract, nor did you make the original grant – they did.

They willingly made a legal transaction and reversing any legal transaction is subject to statute limitations – in other words, just because I have a receipt for my car, does not entitle me to go back to the dealer after 30 years and say, “I made a mistake, here is your car, give me my money back.”

Such a notion sure lyis even less realistic, if I were thinking of trying to undo a contract that I was snot even a party to Likewise with the name.

In order to even attempt to reverse that apparent mistaken transaction, your parents (and only your parents – not you) would have to assemble evidence that they have the ability to return all previously claimed benefits – benefits they arguably “accepted”, thus ratifying the subject contract, but even if they could prove what those benefits were (which we doubt), and then if they could establish capacity to return them, the other side is not under any obligation to accept a return of those benefits that have been paid in good faith, nor are they obligated to return that which they have legally purchased and paid for in good faith, – the duplicate corporate name.

Alternatively, your parents would have to prove that they had been tricked, or fraudulently induced into exchanging their duplicate artificial name for the alleged state benefits.

The problem with this approach is simple.

The duplicate name was created by your parents at no actual or contingent cost to them. Your1parents exchanged that “free” duplicate name for good and valuable consideration, which they actually received, and benefited from, perhaps one might even argue, unjustly.

Subsequently, your parents have never been obligated directly or indirectly to give, or to to provide anything further in consideration of the actual benefits they have received, and perhaps continue to receive, thus technically, “they” have not been defrauded of anything. In fact it could be argued that they received significant real value for something that actually cost them nothing.

Therefore the birth certificate that you hold does not constitute a trust, nor did the prior gift made by your parents by the registration of your birth, create one.

You, by your active behavior, create a de facto trust, in and of the name that never was, or never has been yours.

They do not orchestrate your behavior, you alone do that – voluntarily, albeit,unwittingly.

Remember, you are exercising your right of self-determination.

Fortunately, there is always a way to correct a mistake, but first everyone must recognize, accept, and comprehend what the mistake was, how it happened,who committed it, why it has gone unnoticed until now, who benefited, and how the mistake can be repaired, or at least prevented from recurring.

We were created to govern ourselves, and we were appointed a lineage of kings & queens that acknowledge that aspect of our creation.

Apparently we have an inherent right to “self-determination”.

What this really means, is that whatever we determine to do, is perceived by others, as being done by our own free will.

This perception also applies to those things that we mistakenly do, or that we have been tricked into doing. Mistake number one, performed within the parameters of self-determination was made by your parents, when they were tricked into creating a duplicate of your natural name.

Yet even that trick did not directly defraud them of anything, because as we have previously said, they received significant benefits for having freely created and given up that duplicate name.

This duplicate version of your name is interesting, inasmuch as it is not directly associated with any natural or living being, and must therefore by process of elimination and simple deduction, then be limited to being an artificial creation, or at best, an actual paper creation, that exists on paper as a corporate entity only.

Here is where mistake number two originates.

Because of your parents’ misunderstanding of what they had done, you also misunderstood their actions.

You also mistakenly believed that the duplicate name they sold to the state, was actually somehow still “your” name.

Thus by this mistake of yours, you have committed two serious offenses. First you unwittingly dishonored your parents by abandoning that natural name that they gave you at birth. Second, you unwittingly, commenced behaving “as if”you were that duplicate artificial corporate name that belongs to someone else. You “applied” (also known as asked, begged, pleaded, requested, etc.) for a social insurance number, which effectively is asking permission to “operate” their registered name for commercial purposes. Then you “applied” for various forms of permissions, licenses and other identity documents, all again confirming your intent to carry out or conduct certain activity “in” their registered name; and agreeing to “act”, “as” their registered name, and confirming your desire to be recognized ”as”, or identified “as” their registered name, and to accept all legal and financial obligations for and on behalf of, and as if you were, the irregistered name.

Thus by mistakenly acting as if you were that name that belongs to the state(actually the Bar Association via the banks, but we will explain this later), you unwittingly forfeited by your own apparent self- determination, those gifts of your natural birthright, your inheritance, the value of your productivity, and even your natural name, to the benefit of the owner of that artificial duplicate name.So you do not need, to “identify” with that name. For example, I am me, here I am, this is who you see, and who you see is how you identify me

– I cannot identify me to you – you must do that either by yourself, or for yourself with the aid of others (explained later). We have all been tricked into doing everything in reverse. When you see a duck, you identify it as a duck, by how it appears to YOU, not by how it appears to itself. The duck, like any individual, inherently knows who or what it is, it has no need to identify itself to itself. “Identity”, is truly only that inherent comprehension which is achieved in and by the mind of the party making the identification of something, or someone, outside of him or herself. “I am who I am”, and I stand before you as I am, therefore you are the only one that can identify me, to you. Because YOU, see me, just as you see a duck, and are therefore able to identify “it”, or “me”, because YOU, see it or me. Now you may be able to do this with knowledge or familiarity of me, or with the knowledge that comes from two witnesses that are able to point to me with a certain degree of familiarity, but it is only YOU, that can accept your identification of me, whether made entirely by yourself, or with the help of those witnesses.

However, if you ask me to identify myself, you are mistaken in how identity works. This is why in “law”, identity of a perpetrator, is accomplished by asking witnesses to “point” out the party, not to “name” the party. If I claim to be a name, then it is I that am mistaken, because I cannot be a name, I can only be me.

Likewise a witness cannot be relied upon to have seen or known a “name”,anymore than they could be asked to point out a name in a crowd of people.Furthermore, neither you nor I have the power or the authority to un-grant, or to un-give, that which was given away by our parents – the name – the name we have mistakenly pretended to still have, or to still hold claim to, or to still be called, or claim to still “be”. Therefore, if I am to allow myself to be identified truly as the me that I am, then I must stop allowing myself to be identified as, or by that name which is not even mine.I must distance myself from that mistake and terminate any association with it. That artificial duplicate corporate name is very legally real, and it is a permanently fatal error, inasmuch as we are actually defrauding ourselves when we pretend we can be identified by it, or even by any reference to it. I,like you, can only be identified by another party, or by witness(es) that can stipulate that I, or you, are the individual man or woman that he or she is identifying.

The office of vital statistics does not “record” your name, like the priests or pastors formerly did in the local church Bibles. They unwittingly administer a”transaction”, crafted by lawyers working under the guise and direction of clever bank owners, resulting in a commercial exchange, or, a grant of a name, in consideration of non-specific benefits, perhaps including the illusion of having the name officially recorded for them.This exchange then generates what in law is referred to as the titled ownership of all equitable and legal rights, title and interest in that name, and transfers those rights to the province in right of her majesty, thus everything anyone,including you or I may do, or may produce in that name, belongs to the province, in right of her majesty.

So, the statement of live birth was only an instrument giving rise to an agreement of purchase and sale of a thing called a “name”, and specified as a particular corporate name by the acknowledged spelling. The birth certificate is merely an after-issue receipt. That certified copy is held by a third party, evidencing that the original sale was consummated. That sale had absolutely nothing at all to do with any assets other than the specific artificial “name” – the sale did not include any ownership or entitlement to birthrights or inheritances, regardless of who holds the duplicate receipt (BC). We have forgotten our first law. In exercising our own self-determination, we have given away our natural rights, in favor of the artificial rights associated with the artificial duplicate name, because we have chosen to pretend to be that artificial “duplicate” name. We are not even pretending to be an artificial “person”, merely an artificial “name” (which pretense in itself entirely creates the person)!Think of the ducks. The ducks are born free with their inheritance, so are we. We have also chosen with some more unwitting deliberation, to enable a government of ourselves, ostensibly by ourselves, to have authority to delegate authority over us, and to have authority over all of our natural resources. Our government is not holding “our” names – they are holding “their” names,that formerly belonged to your parents, never to you, so never was yours.

They have legal title to a legal fiction (corporate) name – that is not you, nor was it, or is it your name – it is very simply just another “corporation” registered in the government’s name. You are still a man or a woman that may be recognized by a name called John or Mary, but that name you are recognized by, IS associated with you, inasmuch as you respond to it, and others that know you, know that you respond to it. It just happens to look and sound the same, but it is vastly different than the legal name that is owned by the government as proxy for the Bar Association via the banks.

There is one natural you, and you are entitled to your one true natural name,just like there is one natural Creator, and He declares that His natural name is Yahweh. Now someone else could elect to call themselves Yahweh, but that does not make that someone else into the One Creator. Nor does calling a “legal person” by your name, make that legal person into you. Only you can”act”, or pretend to be that legal person, regardless of what “name” it is associated with, or what name you are called by. Thus it is not a matter of who owns or claims to own the legal name, that is obvious – that party which contractually purchased it for good and valuable consideration from your parents, is in fact and in deed, the legal owner, and always will be.

That does not give them as owner of that name any rights, title or interest in you the natural man or woman, or in your inheritance or birthright, or in the natural name you use, because neither you, nor your birthrights, nor inheritance, nor your natural name, were ever a part of that transaction between your parents and our government. It (the transaction) simply happens to have created a convenient manner by which you were subsequently tricked by the lawyers via their puppet banksters into acting as if you were THAT legal name, instead of simply being you with your natural name, thus resulting in you unwittingly giving the owner of that 5 corporate name, all of your productivity, all of your inheritance and all of your birthright – at least so long as you continue to pretend to be “their” name,which pretense precludes you from actually being you.

The “person” is a creation of YOU – created BY you, when and if, and only when and if you “act” as if you are their artificial, duplicate, corporate name. Seeing that an artificial name cannot be real in the sense that such may not possess its own conscience or ability of volition (like any corporation), neither can the individual that is “acting” as if he or she were “it”, be completely real either,only considered to be an “actor”, a.k.a., a “person” – the key is to comprehend that we must stop acting “as if” we were “their” name, because that behavior creates their “person”. We terminate the person by stopping all activity in”their” name.

Doing so does not preclude us from actually being ourselves and operating in our “own” name, even if our own name is identical to their contractually owned version of it. When we know the difference, we can act accordingly – the quest will arise from getting them – the rest of us, who are us, acting as our government administrators, to comprehend the difference. We do not need to fight to let them retain what they have legally bought and paid for, and we certainly do not need or want to fight to take it away from them. In truth, we do not want anything at all to do with “their” name, which never was ours anyway, all we really want, is to stop our mistaken behavior,which has been that we have until now, acted “as if” we were that name, when in fact we were NOT “THAT” name, neither are we “OUR” name, we are simply us. You, are you, and you are an individual human being (man or woman) called by your natural name given to you by your natural parents, and by coincidence,your parents also sold a completely separate duplicate “name” – something they simply made up and committed to a piece of paper, to the state.

Thus that duplicate name only exists as a piece of paper, and in that paper for monly, it happens to be identical to the natural name you use. The “paper” name that your parents sold to our government on behalf of the Bar via the banks, has no power, no authority, no nothing, except the legal right to be beneficiary to everything any living individual may choose to do, or to offer to do, in its name or for its name. You, as you, AND your natural name, which is yours, are all that is of value. They can have the “empty” paper name; that name that is associated with and becomes an empty fiction paper “person”, when a living individual acts as if he or she were it, and they can do whatever they wish with it, because without you pretending to be it, it has no value at all.

6 The alleged “person” only comes into existence and has potential value, so long as you are behaving “as if” you, a real live human being, were the “name”, thus unwittingly conferring your natural capacity to it – thus, “it” plus “you”operating “it” = a “person”, and they own “it”, therefore they own whatever is done by you “as” it. This reality applies to all corporate entities – simply read the rules of incorporation in any province or state to confirm that a registered company, is deemed in law to be a “legal person, enjoying all of the rights and benefits of that legal person”, by virtue of the name being operated by a living individual(director, or officer, etc.), otherwise it is simply a dormant “registered name”, or“shelf” company.They do not own you, nor do they own your natural name, nor do they own your birthright or your inheritance, or your productivity, until YOU give it to them! They only own “it” the name – and “it”, truly owns nothing other than what YOU”give” it. What your parents gave to you – your natural name, is yours and always will be – no-one can un-give something, but you can dishonor their gift,by pretending to be the secondary “it” that your parents unwittingly created and sold for a price.

We have been duped by ourselves into being governed by a bunch of ourselves– and we are a bunch of idiots, because while we were pretending to govern ourselves, we were first pretending to be a bunch of artificial names that were not even owned by ourselves. Then, much worse than that, we allowed “Law” to step in and be our de facto, if not actual Ruler – we live under the rule of Law,regardless of what we call our system of alleged democratic self-governance. First we must comprehend the significance that the government is “our”government – IT IS US – THERE AIN’T NO ONE HERE BUT US PEOPLE!Unfortunately, almost none of us, including most of us that happen to be our government administrators, are aware of what the problem is, or that a mistake of this magnitude has been made, and certainly none, or at least very few of us,including our government, even know that we are under the rule of LAW. So who is entitled to remedy? Well, who can establish a valid claim. This eliminates our parents, for they benefited much from the transaction they entered into, almost to a degree that could arguably be deemed unjustly so. So have we, the children been defrauded, because we have been tricked into behaving as if we were a name that our parents invented and sold to so me oneelse?

Perhaps, but we must still prove a claim. Theoretically, each of us is a joint beneficiary of all things collectively owned by “us” in the form of our government, so if we are claiming against our government, we are essentially claiming an administrative error, inasmuch as we are our government,therefore any alleged lack or deprivation of individual entitlement, could only be an administrative oversight, not theft or conversion, since “we” being all of the collective individuals that are our government, still own what we as the collective may have allegedly converted, or what we as individuals may not yet have collected, but are entitled to. Its not so much that the government must know who is entitled, because the government IS US, it is US that must first know we are entitled, then we, as our government will obviously also know, and then everyone of us, including our government, will be ready to work toward fixing the main big mistake, which was not a conversion of our inheritance, or a forfeiture of our entitlements, but rather an usurpation of our authority and natural right to self-determination. We, via ourselves operating as our government, have unwittingly allowed the elite members of the Bar Association to place us all under the rule of THEIR Law! We have by our own actions, left ourselves with no right of self-determination because of this most misunderstand reality.

The province did not obtain you via the exchange they made with your parents,it only obtained the duplicate artificial name from them – a simple piece of paper, that like any other corporate entity, includes its own name and all things ever to be done in that name. “You” are still free, so long as you do not pretend to be associated with that corporate name that is their name – that name which is not your name, nor can it ever be. It was never yours. It was first your parents’ private property, then they by lawful right, granted it unto the province in right of her majesty.

Thus you actually have no legal right or claim to it, and by acting – which is a legal form of”pretense”, as if you have had such a claim, you have first defrauded yourself, and then all those around you. We have heard it said that an infant cannot identify itself as a ‘name’, yet the state, acting as (pretending) to be “Child Welfare”, will walk into a hospital and take an infant that hasn’t even been ‘given’ a name by the parents yet.

How does that happen? Child Welfare does not operate under the rule of government, it operates like all of us and like the whole of our government does, under the rule of Law! Therefore, it is US, you, I, and all of our friends and all of our government administrators that must join forces and work together to get out from under the rule of LAW. We must exercise our most fundamental natural right – that of self determination. So long as this artificial corporation called Law has us divided, Law will continue to conquer. They – the Bar Association, have “us”, as in our government, fighting against “us”, as in most of the people, all of the time, so none of us, has ever stopped long enough to realize two extremely important factors: first we are our government and our government is us, and second, Law is our common enemy – the enemy of both us and our government (which is us). Law is the enemy of both “us” and of our “Government”, because we are all one and the same as far as Law is concerned.

We have forgotten the law of our Father, and we have lost the ability to live under that most natural of Law; His natural Law, because we have elected to allow the Bar to create an artificial form of law, which we have adopted to be our Ruler (under their private administration of the Bar). So we must stop pretending to be their name, stop complaining about what“they” are doing wrong, stop denying that our problems begin within and are of our own making, and start acting as real men and woman again, – and start enjoying our freedom. This Is not something that can be done easily within the self-designed limitations of “Law’s” current legal system, however it is important that you know that this can be done, and will be done by exercising our natural right to self-determination – the right to choose not just our form of governance, but also our over-riding form of “ruler ship”, or “law” that governs our governance.

We must determine to exchange democratic governance under the rule of the Bar’s artificial Law, for democratic governance under the rule of our Father’s natural Law – where no men have any special or privilege authority. Check your history, and you will learn that this was the main thrust behind what the founding fathers of the US originally intended – they actually banned and barred all lawyers from being part of the original new colonies, but they did not enforce that edict, and subsequently, the Bar again took over and things have ended up as bad for us now, if not worse than what they had tried to escape from then.You have always owned your birthright and your inheritance, and in this you remain no less complete than the duck. The difference is simple. The duck has always operated as a natural being – the duck. You have operated “as if” you were the un-natural (or artificial) “name”, (thereby creating a person) thus granting all of the results of your operational efforts to the legally registered owner of that artificial name. (“it” – the name, operated by you, results in the creation of a legal person.)

If you read (or re-read if you have already) the legal brief prepared by the Ontario Landowners’ Association (OLA) on Crown Grants (included following this as separate appendix), it may become clear that “our” governments are not empowered with authority to legislate laws that are superior to natural law as administered by the Crown and its agents, such as many municipal laws that they now pretend will supersede the Crown Grant. Likewise our governments have no authority to legislate, much less enforce laws that usurp our natural rights as such rights are guaranteed to be protected under those same Crown Grants, and under our various constitutions, bills of rights, etc.. The government “acts” like they have authority, and we imply our consent, because we also “act” like they have that authority – since we have effectively given up our right of self determination.

Example:ABC Industries Ltd. = Legally Registered *Name = Inactive corporate entity;ABC Industries Ltd. + Chief Operating Officer (Director) = Active“Corporation”; Active “Operation” of registered name event confirmed in “application” to record Articles of Incorporation “to conduct business activity”and subsequent Annual Reports to continue “to conduct business activity”, by“CEO/director/operator”;ABC Industries Ltd. Shareholder(s) = any other legally registered *name(s); JOHN HENRY SMITH = Legally Registered *Name = Inactive corporate entity;JOHN HENRY SMITH + John Henry Smith (Operator) = Active “Corporation”;Active “Operation” of registered *name event confirmed by “application” for S.I.N., being request for permission to Operate in and as the legally registered*name, and subsequent “application(s)” for various forms of “identification,” as being requests for permission to be recognized and identified “as” the registered *name;

JOHN HENRY SMITH Shareholder(s) = Bar Association/Vatican c/o some province in right of Her Majesty;Shareholder(s) of all legally registered name(s) = Bar Association/Vatican c/ osome province in right of Her Majesty;All legally registered *names = Collateral Security Pledged by all UN Member nations to World Bank/IMF and other global banking institutions operating as fronts for and on behalf of Bar Association/Vatican.Thus the Bar Association and or its incestuous Vatican affiliates, own 100% of all things done in all legally registered *names, whether “corporate” or so-called “personal”.

Unfortunately, everyone has been acting improperly for so long, that many are now convinced that this improper behavior is right, so the effort to correct this may well be more difficult than merely recognizing the primary problem – and must include the secondary associated problem which is that of an ignorant society, which ignorance extends even into and throughout our legislative and legal systems.

The recognition must first be inherent within we, the people – we being all of us including all of us that are our government and court administrators,because then all of us can dictate to our courts what we want them to do,regardless of what “Law” wants, because we have the right to terminate the rule of Law, but this will only happen if we collectively comprehend that this is required. We must accept the “Law” is also a legally registered (corporate)*name, and that name is controlled by the Bar, and the sole purpose of that name, is to provide a veil to hide the Bar’s exclusive “rule” over all UN Member states and their respective citizens (or at least all nations proclaiming to live under, or to respect the “rule of Law”).

The natural right to self determination is not at risk of being lost, rather we are at risk of not being able to recover our right to enjoy it as our forefathers once did, simply because we have been tricked into not realizing we have chosen not to exercise our right – we see, but fail to perceive what is going on right before our eyes.There are some of us people, that are currently involved in organizing an effort to share this information for educational and discussion purposes. Your comments, questions and concerns are welcomed in this regard.This information and any information or documents referred to herein, does not constitute legal advice, nor shall it be so construed. Recipients of this information are strongly advised not to rely on the validity of any of this information nor to attempt to utilize any of this information or references made or implied herein as part of any actual or contemplated legal proceeding.If you have legal issues or concerns you should consult with a qualified professional for advice.

Seventh Trick:

The seventh ‘trick’ is to have you affix your “signature” to documents, thereby creating joinder with Artificial Person represented by the “signature” in some official capacity. Human beings use an “autograph” not a “signature”.

Live People seal documents with an autograph; Corporations use signatures Strictly speaking, they aren’t allowed to address you—- you are a foreign state operating in a foreign jurisdiction, utterly immune and separate from them. If they speak to you they also have a hard time keeping up the pretension that you are “dead”. The proper way to close all correspondence is with the word “Sincerely” and with your sealed autograph. Living people have autographs, not signatures. Signatures are made by corporate officers when they are acting in corporate office. So you would autograph your full given “official” name first middle last and add the following disclaimer: “non-negotiable autograph, all rights reserved”.

To be completely proper, you would write this is RED ink (red is for blood and land jurisdiction, blue is for water and maritime jurisdictions—which they have been using exclusively)and you would seal the document near your autograph with your right thumbprint also in red ink. Last but not least, you would affix a small stamp-sized color copy of your family crest at the bottom right hand corner of the last page of the document. This completely seals a document—- the thumbprint stands for you the individual, the crest for your family name.

On the 30th day of March 2023
Pope Francis repudiated
‘The Doctrine of Discovery’
stating it was never a papal bull,
but more of a political statement
attempting to resolve disputes between
England, France, Spain, Portugal and Holland.

Why has King Charles III never recognised the Sovereignty of the tribes of Australia?

Why does he continue to exploit the natural resources of Australia, New Zealand and many other colonial nations through belligerent occupation?

Why is Australia not Australia?

* * * *

92.7 Australia can only be known as the following;

The evidence clearly demonstrates that the
continental mainland is not Australia at all.

The reason this fraud has been committed upon the people in the world is because the Kings and Queens of Britain had no lawful right to take the land and the resources and genocide the original people.

This crime has been perpetrated since the first colonisation starting on 26 January 1788, and has continued unabated for the last 236 years.

The letter attached shows the intent offered by the true crown of Australia and New Zealand to peacefully resolve this matter, while maintaining the integrity of the Commonwealth of Nations.

We can see by the above table of territories
that Australia includes Norfolk Island.

The problem with this is that Norfolk Island was granted to the descendants of the Bounty mutineers by Queen Victoria in the year 1856 by royal warrant.

The criminal government masquerading in Canberra realised this and in 2016 sent three Australian navy ships to unlawfully and forcefully reclaim Norfolk Island into their territory.

Furthermore, they realised if they did not control the permanent population of two thousand people who lived peacefully and independently on Norfolk Island, they would be without a permanent population under international law.

The crimes committed by the criminal government of Australia are; participating in an undeclared war against a nation at peace, human trafficking, trespass and property theft.

It is with absolute insult to the true crown of Australia and New Zealand that King Charles III could not observe the basic principals of jus gentium and the application of well-defined international law.

We regret that there was no other option than to seek the assistance of the international press, to shine a light on the criminal cartel known as, King Charles III the King of Britain, and the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and NEW ZEALAND.

No lawful treaty has ever been entered into between the COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA and the original Sovereigns.

The Voice Referendum was nothing more than an elaborate trick by the criminal government of Australia, in an attempt, to usurp the Sovereignty of the original people.

This government deception was overwhelmingly rejected, by a large majority of decent men and women who participated in the Referendum.

The original people of the land commonly called Australia are organised and ready to undertake the lawful process of Self-determination to create a more perfect union, and peacefully take their place among the nations of the world.

Who is taxing us?

Where does the tax we pay go?

WHY are we paying tax at all?

Australia was sold to USA many years ago
– but what was sold?

The ‘territories’ or the huge lump of mineral-rich-dirt-with-no-name surrounded by the locations listed.

Many of them couldn’t even be listed as ‘islands’
as they’re not much bigger than
bumps sticking out of the ocean.

Either way.

More history that’s been hidden.

More skulduggery to screw us over
– if it wasn’t it wouldn’t be a secret.